"Iraq will not find peace or
stability until the U.S. occupation ends. ... There was no basis
for a war in Iraq. It was wrong to go in, and it's wrong to stay
in. ... It is time to get the U.N. in and the U.S. out of Iraq."
--Dennis
Kuchinich
Basra, Iraq. March 22, 2003 Man carries body of small girl
killed during the siege of Basra. Photo:
Amr Nabil, AP
"We need to humanize the reality of this terrible conflict.
When they say today that there's a massive bombardment, what
they mean is that in a country in which 50% of the people
are 15 or younger, what we are really doing is murdering children.
We can't give up the plea for sanity." --Frieda
Engel, 84, Seniors for Peace
¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤
Farnaz Fassihi: From Baghdad
Farnaz Fassihi
is a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, currently assigned
as their middle-east correspondent, based in Iraq. A few days
ago, she sent some friends an email describing the real state
of affairs in the country -- no spin, no editorial control, no
publisher's censorship, just one unhappy person letting her friends
know what she's faced with. The email was forwarded on to a number
of colleagues, and from there it escaped into the blogosphere.
It is pasted below.
From: Farnaz Fassihi
Subject: From Baghdad
Being a foreign correspondent in Baghdad these days is like being
under virtual house arrest. Forget about the reasons that lured
me to this job: a chance to see the world, explore the exotic,
meet new people in far away lands, discover their ways and tell
stories that could make a difference.
Little by little, day-by-day, being based in Iraq has defied
all those reasons. I am house bound. I leave when I have a very
good reason to, and a scheduled interview. I avoid going to people's
homes and never walk in the streets. I can't go grocery shopping
any more, can't eat in restaurants, can't strike up a conversation
with strangers, can't look for stories, can't drive in any thing
but a full armored car, can't go to scenes of breaking news stories,
can't be stuck in traffic, can't speak English outside, can't
take a road trip, can't say I'm an American, can't linger at checkpoints,
can't be curious about what people are saying, doing, feeling.
And can't and can't. There has been one too many close calls,
including a car bomb so near our house that it blew out all the
windows. So now my most pressing concern every day is not to write
a kick-ass story but to stay alive and make sure our Iraqi employees
stay alive. In Baghdad I am a security personnel first, a reporter
second.
It's hard to pinpoint when the 'turning point' exactly began.
Was it April when the Fallujah fell out of the grasp of the Americans?
Was it when Moqtada and Jish Mahdi declared war on the U.S. military?
Was it when Sadr City, home to ten percent of Iraq's population,
became a nightly battlefield for the Americans? Or was it when
the insurgency began spreading from isolated pockets in the Sunni
triangle to include most of Iraq?
Despite President Bush's rosy assessments, Iraq remains a disaster.
If under Saddam it was a 'potential' threat, under the Americans
it has been transformed to 'imminent and active threat,' a foreign
policy failure bound to haunt the United States for decades to
come.
Iraqis like to call this mess 'the situation.' When asked 'how
are thing?' they reply: 'the situation is very bad."
What they mean by situation is this: the Iraqi government doesn't
control most Iraqi cities, there are several car bombs going off
each day around the country killing and injuring scores of innocent
people, the
country's roads are becoming impassable and littered by hundreds
of landmines and explosive devices aimed to kill American soldiers,
there are assassinations, kidnappings and beheadings. The situation,
basically, means a raging barbaric guerilla war. In four days,
110 people died and over 300 got injured in Baghdad alone. The
numbers are so shocking that the ministry of health - which was
attempting an exercise of public transparency by releasing the
numbers - has now stopped disclosing them.
Insurgents now attack Americans 87 times a day.
A friend drove thru the Shiite slum of Sadr City yesterday. He
said young men were openly placing improvised explosive devices
into the ground. They melt a shallow hole into the asphalt, dig
the explosive, cover it with dirt and put an old tire or plastic
can over it to signal to the locals this is booby-trapped. He
said on the main roads of Sadr City, there were a dozen landmines
per every ten yards. His car snaked and swirled to avoid driving
over them. Behind the walls sits an angry Iraqi ready to detonate
them as soon as an American convoy gets near. This is in Shiite
land, the population that was supposed to love America for liberating
Iraq.
For journalists the significant turning point came with the wave
of abduction and kidnappings. Only two weeks ago we felt safe
around Baghdad because foreigners were being abducted on the roads
and highways between towns. Then came a frantic phone call from
a journalist female friend at 11 p.m. telling me two Italian women
had been abducted from their homes in broad daylight. Then the
two Americans, who got beheaded this week and the Brit, were abducted
from their homes in a residential neighborhood. They were supplying
the entire block with round the clock electricity from their generator
to win friends. The abductors grabbed one of them at 6 a.m. when
he came out to switch on the generator; his beheaded body was
thrown back near the neighborhoods.
The insurgency, we are told, is rampant with no signs of calming
down. If any thing, it is growing stronger, more organized and
more sophisticated every day. The various elements within it -
baathists, criminals, nationalists and Al Qaeda - are cooperating
and coordinating.
I went to an emergency meeting for foreign correspondents with
the military and embassy to discuss the kidnappings. We were somberly
told our fate would largely depend on where we were in the kidnapping
chain once it was determined we were missing. Here is how it goes:
criminal gangs grab you and sell you up to Baathists in Fallujah,
who will in turn sell you to Al Qaeda. In turn, cash and weapons
flow the other way from Al Qaeda to the Baathisst to the criminals.
My friend Georges, the French journalist snatched on the road
to Najaf, has been missing for a month with no word on release
or whether he is still alive.
America's last hope for a quick exit? The Iraqi police and National
Guard units we are spending billions of dollars to train. The
cops are being murdered by the dozens every day - over 700 to
date - and the insurgents are infiltrating their ranks. The problem
is so serious that the U.S. military has allocated $6 million
dollars to buy out 30,000 cops they just trained to get rid of
them quietly.
As for reconstruction: firstly it's so unsafe for foreigners
to operate that almost all projects have come to a halt. After
two years, of the $18 billion Congress appropriated for Iraq reconstruction
only about $1 billion or so has been spent and a chuck has now
been reallocated for improving security, a sign of just how bad
things are going here.
Oil dreams? Insurgents disrupt oil flow routinely as a result
of sabotage and oil prices have hit record high of $49 a barrel.
Who did this war exactly benefit? Was it worth it? Are we safer
because Saddam is holed up and Al Qaeda is running around in Iraq?
Iraqis say that thanks to America they got freedom in exchange
for insecurity. Guess what? They say they'd take security over
freedom any day, even if it means having a dictator ruler.
I heard an educated Iraqi say today that if Saddam Hussein were
allowed to run for elections he would get the majority of the
vote. This is truly sad.
Then I went to see an Iraqi scholar this week to talk to him
about elections here. He has been trying to educate the public
on the importance of voting. He said, "President Bush wanted
to turn Iraq into a democracy that would be an example for the
Middle East. Forget about democracy, forget about being a model
for the region, we have to salvage Iraq before all is lost."
One could argue that Iraq is already lost beyond salvation. For
those of us on the ground it's hard to imagine what if any thing
could salvage it from its violent downward spiral. The genie of
terrorism, chaos and mayhem has been unleashed onto this country
as a result of American mistakes and it can't be put back into
a bottle.
The Iraqi government is talking about having elections in three
months while half of the country remains a 'no go zone' - out
of the hands of the government and the Americans and out of reach
of journalists. In the other half, the disenchanted population
is too terrified to show up at polling stations. The Sunnis have
already said they'd boycott lections, leaving the stage open for
polarized government of Kurds and Shiites that will not be deemed
as legitimate and will most certainly lead to civil war.
I asked a 28-year-old engineer if he and his family would participate
in the Iraqi elections since it was the first time Iraqis could
to some degree elect a leadership. His response summed it all:
"Go and vote and risk being blown into pieces or followed
by the insurgents and murdered for cooperating with the Americans?
For what? To practice democracy? Are you joking?"
Note: According to Tim Rutten's column in the Los Angeles
Times, who has obtained on-the-record quotes from the WSJ
editor on this, the Wall Street Journal is now recalling Ms. Fassihi
for a "long-planned vacation" that will extend until
past November
2nd. Which means that she's barred from writing about Iraq until
after the US election.
¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ ¤
Photos Show Rape of Iraqi Women by US Occupation
Forces
by Ernesto Cienfuegos
La Voz de Aztlan
Los Angeles, Alta California - May 2, 2004 - (ACN) The release,
by CBS News, of the photographs showing the heinous sexual abuse
and torture of Iraqi POW's at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison
has opened a Pandora's box for the Bush regime. Apparently, the
suspended US commander of the prison where the worst abuses took
place, Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, has refused to take
the fall by herself and has implicated the CIA, Military Intelligence
and private US government contractors in the torturing of POW's
and in the raping of Iraqi women detainees as well.
Brigadier General Janis Karpinski said to the Washington Post
that Military Intelligence, rather than the Military Police, dictated
the treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison. "The prison,
and that particular cellblock where the events took place, were
under the control of the Military Intelligence Command,"
Brigadier General Karpinski said to the Washington Post Saturday
night in a telephone interview from her home in Hilton Head,
South Carolina.
Brigadier General Karpinski, who commanded the 800th Military
Police Brigade, described a high-pressure Military Intelligence
and CIA command that prized successful interrogations. A month
before the alleged abuses and rapes occurred, she said, a team
of CIA, Military Intelligence officers and private consultants
under the employ of the US government came to Abu Ghraib. "Their
main and specific mission was to give the interrogators new techniques
to get more information from detainees," she said.
Today, new photographs were sent to La Voz de Aztlan from confidential
sources depicting the shocking rapes of two Iraqi women by what
are purported to be US Military Intelligence personnel and private
US mercenaries in military fatigues. It is now known that hundreds
of these photographs had been in circulation among the troops
in Iraq. The graphic photos were being swapped between the soldiers
like baseball cards.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, one Mexican-American soldier
told La Voz de Aztlan, "Maybe the officers didn't know what
was going on, but everybody else did. I have seen literally hundreds
of these types of pictures." Many of the pictures were destroyed
last September when the luggage of soldiers was searched as they
left Iraq, he said
An investigation, led by Army Major General Antonio M. Taguba,
identified two military intelligence officers and two civilian
contractors for the Army as key figures in the abuse cases at
the Abu Ghraib prison. In an internal report on his findings,
Major General Taguba said he suspected that the four were "either
directly or indirectly responsible for the abuses at Abu Ghraib
and strongly recommended disciplinary action."
The Taguba report states that "military intelligence interrogators
and other U.S. Government Agency interrogators actively requested
that Military Police guards set physical and mental conditions
for favorable interrogation of witnesses." The report noted
that one civilian interrogator, a contractor from a company
called CACI International and attached to the 205th Military Intelligence
Brigade, "clearly knew his instructions" to the Military
Police equated to physical and sexual abuse. It is not known whether
these instructions included, or led to, the raping of Iraqi women
detainees as well.
The young American Marine is exultant. "It's a sniper's dream,'
he tells a Los Angeles Times reporter on the outskirts of Fallujah.
"You can go anywhere and there so many ways to fire at the
enemy without him knowing where you are."
"Sometimes a guy will go down, and I'll let him scream a
bit to destroy the morale of his buddies. Then I'll use a second
shot."
"To take a bad guy out," he explains, "is an incomparable
"adrenaline rush." He brags of having "24 confirmed
kills" in the initial phase of the brutal U.S. onslaught
against the rebel city of 300,000 people.
Faced with intransigent popular resistance that recalls the heroic
Vietcong defense of Hue in 1968, the Marines have again unleashed
indiscriminate terror. According to independent journalists and
local medical workers, they have slaughtered at least two hundred
women and children in the first two weeks of fighting.
The battle of Fallujah, together with the conflicts unfolding
in Shiia cities and Baghdad slums, are high-stakes tests, not
just of U.S. policy in Iraq, but of Washington's ability to dominate
what Pentagon planners consider the "key battlespace of the
future" -- the Third World city.
The Mogadishu debacle of 1993, when neighborhood militias inflicted
60% casualties on elite Army Rangers, forced U.S. strategists
to rethink what is known in Pentagonese as MOUT: "Militarized
Operations on Urbanized Terrain." Ultimately, a National
Defense Panel review in December 1997 castigated the Army as unprepared
for protracted combat in the near impassable, maze-like streets
of the poverty-stricken cities of the Third World.
As a result, the four armed services, coordinated by the Joint
Staff Urban Working Group, launched crash programs to master street-fighting
under realistic third-world conditions. "The future of warfare,"
the journal of the Army War College declared, "lies in the
streets, sewers, high-rise buildings, and sprawl of houses that
form the broken cities of the world."
Israeli advisors were quietly brought in to teach Marines, Rangers,
and Navy Seals the state-of-the-art tactics -- especially the
sophisticated coordination of sniper and demolition teams with
heavy armor and overwhelming airpower -- so ruthlessly used by
Israeli Defense Forces in Gaza and the West Bank.
Artificial cityscapes (complete with "smoke and sound systems")
were built to simulate combat conditions in densely populated
neighborhoods of cities like Baghdad or Port-au-Prince. The Marine
Corps Urban Warfighting Laboratory also staged realistic war games
("Urban Warrior") in Oakland and Chicago, while the
Army's Special Operations Command "invaded" Pittsburgh.
Today, many of the Marines inside Fallujah are graduates of these
Urban Warrior exercises as well as mock combat at "Yodaville"
(the Urban Training Facility in Yuma, Arizona), while some of
the Army units encircling Najaf and the Baghdad slum neighborhood
of Sadr City are alumni of the new $34 million MOUT simulator
at Fort Polk, Louisiana.
This tactical "Israelization" of U.S. combat doctrine
has been accompanied by what might be called a "Sharonization"
of the Pentagon's worldview. Military theorists are now deeply
involved in imagining how the evolving capacity of high-tech warfare
can contain, if not destroy, chronic "terrorist" insurgencies
rooted in the desperation of growing megaslums.
To help develop a geopolitical framework for urban war-fighting,
military planners turned in the 1990s to the RAND Corporation:
Dr. Strangelove's old alma mater. RAND, a nonprofit think tank
established by the Air Force in 1948, was notorious for war-gaming
nuclear Armageddon in the 1950s and for helping plan the Vietnam
War in the 1960s. These days RAND does cities -- big time. Its
researchers ponder urban crime statistics, inner-city public health,
and the privatization of public education. They also run the Army's
Arroyo Center which has published a small library of recent studies
on the context and mechanics of urban warfare.
One of the most important RAND projects, initiated in the early
1990s, has been a major study of "how demographic changes
will affect future conflict." The bottom line, RAND finds,
is that the urbanization of world poverty has produced "the
urbanization of insurgency" (the title, in fact, of their
report).
"Insurgents are following their followers into the cities,"
RAND warns, "setting up 'liberated zones' in urban shantytowns.
Neither U.S. doctrine, nor training, nor equipment is designed
for urban counterinsurgency." As a result, the slum has become
the weakest link in the American empire.
The RAND researchers reflect on the example of El Salvador where
the local military, despite massive U.S. support, was unable to
stop FMLN guerrillas from opening an urban front. Indeed, "had
the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front rebels effectively
operated within the cities earlier in the insurgency, it is questionable
how much the United States could have done to help maintain even
the stalemate between the government and the insurgents."
More recently, a leading Air Force theorist has made similar
points in the Aerospace Power Journal. "Rapid urbanization
in developing countries," writes Captain Troy Thomas in the
spring 2002 issue, "results in a battlespace environment
that is decreasingly knowable since it is increasingly unplanned."
Thomas contrasts modern, "hierarchical" urban cores,
whose centralized infrastructures are easily crippled by either
air strikes (Belgrade) or terrorist attacks (Manhattan), with
the sprawling slum peripheries of the Third World, organized by
"informal, decentralized subsystems, "where no blueprints
exist, and points of leverage in the system are not readily discernable."
Using the "sea of urban squalor" that surrounds Pakistan's
Karachi as an example, Thomas portrays the staggering challenge
of "asymmetric combat" within "non-nodal, non-hierarchical"
urban terrains against "clan-based" militias propelled
by "desperation and anger." He cites the sprawling slums
of Lagos, Nigeria, and Kinshasa in the Congo as other potential
nightmare battlefields.
However Captain Thomas (whose article is provocatively entitled
"Slumlords: Aerospace Power in Urban Fights"), like
RAND, is brazenly confident that the Pentagon's massive new investments
in MOUT technology and training will surmount all the fractal
complexities of slum warfare. One of the RAND cookbooks ("Aerospace
Operations in Urban Environments") even provides a helpful
table to calculate the acceptable threshold of "collateral
damage" (aka dead babies) under different operational and
political constraints.
The occupation of Iraq has, of course, been portrayed by Bush
ideologues as a "laboratory for democracy" in the Middle
East. To MOUT geeks, on the other hand, it is a laboratory of
a different kind, where Marine snipers and Air Force pilots test
out new killing techniques in an emergent world war against the
urban poor.
Mike Davis is author, most recently, of the kids' adventure,
Land of the Lost Mammoths (Perceval Press, 2003) and co-author
of Under the Perfect Sun: the San Diego Tourists Never See (New
Press, 2003) among other books.
How one Syrian came to wage jihad against U.S. soldiers in
Iraq
Darren Foster
Sunday, March 21, 2004
The sun was setting when they arrived near the border crossing
at Abu Kamal. There were seven of them from the same small town.
Another group of 15 had left earlier that day, just after morning
prayers.
Abed had made his decision to join them quickly. "I didn't
have to take out a pen and start calculating," he said. It
was just over a week into the U.S. bombing of Iraq and Abed had
seen enough, but the image of a 13-year-old Iraqi boy named Ali
who had both his arms blown off in an American air strike had
clinched it for him. "There was something inside that made
me explode."
For years, Abed had been fed a steady diet of images of children
killed and maimed in conflicts that resonated close to his heart
but were just a bit too far off to make him want to mount a defense.
In the body of Islam, Abed explained, if one person gets cut we
all feel the pain. The helplessness and rage didn't just fester;
they were reinforced in discussions at the mosque, by broadcasts
on satellite TV and captured in songs and photos exchanged over
the Internet.
Until the day the battle came knocking at his door. Abed's home
in eastern Syria is less than 50 miles from the Iraqi border -
too close, he felt, for him to do nothing.
Abed steeled himself in the soft fuchsia light that bathes the
rocky expanse when the sun first sinks below the horizon. Then,
with just the stars and moon guiding him, he made his way toward
the fence. Suddenly, he heard gunshots. The border police had
spotted the group and were firing into the air. But that wasn't
going to stop Abed; he was prepared to be a martyr.
He and his group dashed across the small strip of no-man's-land
that separates Syria and Iraq. When they reached the other side,
trucks were waiting to take them to Baghdad. Abed had no idea
they would be there. "It wasn't organized," he told
me.
Abed looks older than his 26 years. He's about 6 feet tall and
stocky. Though most of his friends tend to dress in the more traditional
tuniclike galabias, Abed wears Western-style clothes circa 1989
- faded blue jeans, T- shirts with geometric patterns. And unlike
the long beards his friends sport, Abed's is closely cropped.
He's jocular and quick to flash his horse-toothed smile. But
when he begins to speak of his decision to fight against the Americans
in Iraq, Abed turns grave, rubbing his large, calloused hands
together.
I first learned of Abed through a Syrian friend, Zaher, whom
I met while visiting Damascus. I had arrived in Syria just as
Washington began stepping up pressure on the country for, among
other things, allowing foreign fighters to cross its borders to
attack U.S. troops. As an American in Damascus, it was difficult
to avoid the subject of the war. Everyone I spoke with told me
they opposed what they saw as an American invasion. And a few
young Damascenes told me how they wished they had joined the ranks
of the mujahedeen that had gone to fight. But it was Zaher who
provided me with the first credible lead to Syrians who had actually
crossed the border into Iraq to fight against the Americans. Many
of the young men from the village in eastern Syria where he had
grown up had gone, Zaher said. To illustrate the sentiments of
the people in this region toward these local mujahedeen, Zaher
told me a little about Abed.
Before the war in Iraq, Zaher said, Abed was well known around
the village as being a bit of a clown. But by crossing the border
to fight, Abed had shown that he was willing to make the ultimate
sacrifice and among the mujahedeen, he proved himself to be a
brave leader. Word got around and when Abed returned, he commanded
a whole new respect. In fact, the mujahedeen from Zaher's village,
though defeated, were hometown heroes.
After hearing Zaher's stories, I and a couple of colleagues,
Mike and Mariana, who had been studying Arabic in Damascus for
the summer, asked him if he could introduce us to some of the
fighters. Posing as tourists to keep under the radar of Syria's
secret police, we rented a car and along with Zaher, we headed
east.
Almost five months after President Bush declared an end to the
war, I arrived in a dusty town on the banks of the Euphrates,
a lazy river ride away from Iraq. At night, the pulsing orange
glow of oil fields lights up the horizon, and during the day farmers
till the verdant flood plains of Mesopotamia. The land then gives
way to vast stretches of parched desert.
The border that divides eastern Syria from western Iraq is like
a mirror reflecting not only a similar landscape but also a shared
culture and tradition whose ancient roots make folly of lines
drawn on maps. Clan ties, which are the first order of allegiance
before any other politics in the region, overlap the border.
In the windows of shops and restaurants in the towns throughout
the area, colorful posters still hang celebrating the Syrian martyrs
who died fighting on their neighbor's soil. The small yearbooklike
portraits of young men - some as young as 16, framed in floating
hearts and superimposed over a map of Iraq - might be tacky if
they weren't so profound.
On our first morning, we drove out to a market in a scratch of
desert on the outskirts of a small town in the region. Zaher had
said that this was where we could find Mohammed, one of the leaders
of the local mujahedeen.
While Zaher went looking for Mohammed, I wandered toward the
market entrance where a man with a salt and pepper beard and red-checkered
kaffiyeh greeted me. He began talking excitedly in Arabic, and
not understanding, I just smiled broadly like a friendly tourist,
nodding my head where I thought it was appropriate. I soon realized
that he was repeating the same question: "Are you American?"
Although the baggage associated with being an American abroad
has become heavier over the years, I don't normally shy away from
this question. In Damascus, other than acting as an occasional
sounding board for gripes about George Bush, I was, without exception,
warmly received. But before we left, Zaher had voiced his concern.
He wasn't so much worried for my safety as he was about getting
people to open up.
I decided to use the opportunity as a litmus test. By this point,
a number of other men had gathered around and were staring me
up and down. Sensing the man's growing frustration, I finally
answered, "Yes."
With that, the old man's eyes narrowed. "American,"
he exclaimed and holding me in an intense glare, he ran his forefinger
across his neck; sign language for I slit your throat. He dropped
his finger sharply to punctuate the end of the slice and took
a step back in a way that didn't so much speak of relenting, as
it did that he might pounce on me at any moment. Just then another
man placed his hand on my shoulder and said in English, "Maybe
if you American, they kill you."
Before I could erase the frozen smile from my face, Zaher appeared
out of nowhere and settled it. From then on I was Irish.
Mohammed had already left the market, so we decided to call for
him at his house.
Based on outward appearances, it's safe to assume that if Mohammed
entered an airport in the United States, he would be put through
the security wringer. In fact, my first reaction upon meeting
him was that with the exception of a nose like Abe Vigoda, he
could very well be the spawn of Osama bin Laden. I wasn't the
only one who made this connection. As we were making introductions
in the large living room of his family's home, his uncle reached
over and grabbed Mohammed's long, burly beard and said, "Osama
bin Laden" to the great amusement of all around. Then, like
a kid who discovers that he had just said something funny, his
uncle continued, "Terrorist, terrorist" motioning his
hands over Mohammed's white kaffiyeh and galabia like a game show
hostess presenting a prize washing machine.
Like everyone in this area, Mohammed was born a Muslim. He began
studying the Koran when he was 5 or 6. By the time he was 14,
he had become devout in his beliefs and began teaching the Koran
to children. Now 30, he still teaches at a Koranic school, where
he is held in great esteem. In conversation, he frequently refers
to the Koran, chanting verses to back up his points.
In Mohammed's bedroom, it's all Islam all the time. A gold grandfather-like
clock in the corner of the room plays the call to prayer every
hour. Calligraphy prints of Koranic verses decorate his walls
and shelves. And a photo of a forest where contorted tree trunks
spell out "Allah" in Arabic - a divinely inspired phenomenon,
he explained - hangs above his bed. It was sort of like entering
my friend's little brother's room, but with all photos of J. Lo,
down to the screensaver on his computer, replaced by Islamic paraphernalia.
I was surprised to see that the information age had reached Mohammed's
bedroom. But even with the world at his fingertips, Mohammed's
interests did not seem to extend past Islamic themes. After pouring
us some more tea, which he did with the graceful efficiency of
someone who has repeated a task a thousand times over, Mohammed
began playing some Malaysian Nasheed music videos that he had
downloaded off the Internet. They were all variations of the same
format: a man singing Islamic songs backed by a chorus of children
in colorful robes and time-elapsed pictures of clouds moving over
a rainforest.
But not everything Mohammed downloads is so serene. A couple
of nights later when a group of us, including some young children
from the neighborhood, were again sitting around his bedroom,
Mohammed showed us some of his other files. Superimposed over
an American flag or fighter jets, a montage of gruesome photos
passed. The pictures carried the insignia of various Arabic television
networks - video stills from reports that had run on TV - and
the sound track was a cacophony of exploding bombs and screams.
On U.S. television, the photos would have never made it past
the censors. I couldn't remember when I had seen such graphic
content, and here I was watching what Mohammed describes as the
atrocities committed by the United States against the Arab world,
with an audience of children. More disturbing than the actual
photos is that they represent the story of America that many Syrians
seem to accept. Whatever the sins of people like Saddam Hussein,
it is America who is the aggressor. It is America who drops the
bombs and it is America who maims the children. This is the story
being handed down to the next generation.
While we sat around a plastic tablecloth that had been laid on
the floor with plates of stuffed tomatoes and eggplants, yogurt
and salads, Zaher explained to Mohammed the nature of our trip:
We had been studying Arabic in Damascus, we were interested in
learning more about Islam and understanding for ourselves why
there was this great divide between the East and the West.
We had worked out our approach while we were still in Damascus.
For the sake of getting the people to talk to us, Zaher advised,
it was better if we didn't say that we were journalists. "We
must put this a different way," he explained. "They
think how I think, even more. I know how CNN and the BBC are.
They twist things just a little bit to make the Arabs look bad.
If they know you are a journalist from the West, they will not
talk to you... It is better you think of this as a vacation."
People here frequently referred to Western journalists as propagandists
and believe all media to be an apparatus of the U. S. government,
which is little more than a puppet of Israel. There was no convincing
Zaher, never mind the fighters we were trying to get to speak
with us, that the picture would not inevitably be distorted to
their detriment.
So a "vacation" it was. But even under the guise of
tourists, we weren't completely safe. Mike had already been picked
up by the Mukhabarat, Syria's secret police, for nothing more
than walking while being a foreigner. He managed to persuade them
that he was just a tourist and after a few formalities, they bought
him a kebab for any trouble they caused him. If he had been in
possession of film equipment and tapes with Syrian mujahedeen
explaining that waging jihad in Iraq was sanctioned by the government
of Syria, as we soon would be, it's likely that he would have
been having bread and water instead. Never mind what would happen
to those who agreed to speak with us.
Since 1963, Syria has operated under a state of emergency, effectively
being run as a police state with a complex web of secret police
and informants. The law gives security agencies sweeping authority
and anyone whose loyalty to the state is in question may be arrested
or detained under the most arbitrary of pretexts. It's taken for
granted that phones are bugged and e- mails monitored. Most Syrians
are cautious about speaking publicly about politics or any other
issue that could be considered subversive.
Refusing to work as an informant for the Mukhabarat had already
landed Zaher in prison for six months, where aside from frequent
beatings, he received electric shocks. By acting as our fixer,
translator and cultural liaison, he was taking an incredible risk.
Since Zaher knew better the terrain we were about to enter and
undoubtedly had the most to lose, we agreed for his protection
and all others involved that we wouldn't use real names or mention
the specific town we were to visit. "If you get in trouble
in Syria, you have the support of the U.S. Embassy," he told
me. "We have nothing. We have no support. The state, for
us, is the enemy."
That evening, Mohammed arranged for us to meet with some of his
friends at the Koranic school where he taught. When we arrived,
there was a mountain of sandals beside the door, an early warning
that we might have gotten more than we bargained for. Inside,
there were about 30 adults and 10 children, most I assumed had
just come straight from the mosque as they were dressed in their
traditional white robes. Cushions were arranged around the perimeter
of the room, and we were directed to our seats in the circle of
expectant faces.
To start off, the eldest man, Ammad, said that the children wanted
to recite poems written by a friend of his from the oil field
where he worked. "This is a small chapter of a poem describing
or praising the martyrs who have fallen in the Iraq war,"
Ammad explained.
An 8-year-old boy scooted himself in front of Mohammed and began
from memory. Every so often, Mohammed would lean forward and whisper
into the boy's ear to remind him to pump his fist in the air.
But he wasn't convincing enough for some people in the room, so
the men sitting beside me began demonstrating how he should launch
his fist higher. All the while, the other boys behind him mouthed
along with the words:
Shahid (martyr) is you; you are the greatest.
And the most generous of us all is you
Everyone dies and his name is buried
Except for the name of Shahid
Which gets greater never less...
You kept the heads of the Arabs high
And would not let them bow
You are Shahid, you are the hero, you are the greatest...
Ammad then called on his son, Rami, who made his way to the center
of the circle. The 9-year-old was going to recite two poems, he
explained, one denouncing the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian
territories and another about the injustices of U.N. resolutions.
Before he had even been introduced as he sat among the other
boys, Rami had made an impression on me. As he mouthed the words
of the Koran and the first poem, he bore a pained expression highlighted
by a birthmark on his cheek that, at first, I had mistaken for
a tearstain. When it was Rami's turn, Mohammed didn't need to
remind him of anything. His voice cracked under the weight of
his words and his sullen look became animated, contorting with
a mixture of what I gathered was pain, anger and rage. Rami sold
his pumping fists; it didn't look forced or choreographed.
When Ammad was describing the subjects of the poems, I hastened
to think that these children couldn't possibly comprehend the
full meaning of their words. But that was before Rami. After the
exchange was over, I went up to Ammad and told him how powerful
Rami's poetry reading had been. With a modest sort of fatherly
pride Ammad replied, "He really feels these things."
It wasn't until I had the poems translated that I understood
what "these things" were. I sat with the translator
while he watched the video. He stopped the tape, turned to me,
and before translating, said: "This is really disturbing.
These kids should be out playing marbles or singing nursery rhymes,
not memorizing these poems."
Here are a few lines from Rami's poems about the Israeli occupation:
In the dark committee of the Council of United Nations
The spilling of my blood was legitimated in the cradles and in
the mosques.. .
They show the worst of behavior
They cut with swords of death and genocide
And our nations have been shattered
They have been led like lambs to their slaughter
They do not ask about Jenin and her uprising
They do not ask about the conditions of the tent-people
Is there anyone who rents god's land to be lived on?
Leave Oslo, Camp David and the rest
Rights do not return except at the cost of blood
You ignorant people have been betrayed by conspirators
Your silence is the silence of the deaf and dumb
You who extended a helping hand to ill-born Jews
You who rushed into negotiations blindly
These are the crimes that you are now harvesting
That is why you are like catamites and slaves today
You do not expel their ambassadors from your capitals!
And you sign accords of shame and sickness!
Your have had your willpower destroyed
Like a cat without claws
You live together in the holes with mice
It is sad to see a people whose leaders are like puppets
Moved around in the darkness by Sharon
To say that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a preoccupation
in these parts is an understatement - it's an integral part of
the "getting to know you" conversation. When Mike was
picked up by the Mukhabarat, after getting all his information,
the first question they asked him was what he thought about the
Israeli occupation. So when Ammad opened the floor to questions,
our cultural exchange turned into a one-way dialogue about the
issue, with direct questions and thinly veiled theoretical situations
put before us. We quickly learned to keep our answers short, vague
and non-confrontational. "I couldn't imagine if it happened
in my country," became our diplomatic sound bite.
At one point, one of the young men pulled me aside and asked,
as an Irishman, how I felt about the occupation in my country.
Pushing the deception a little further, I explained that I was
from Dublin, which isn't in Northern Ireland. Fearing that I would
have to explain myself, I quickly put a question to the young
man: How did he feel about his new neighbors? "The occupation
will have to end," he said. "We have always been here
and we will always be here, the Americans will be forced to leave."
After the meeting at the Koranic school, Mohammed told us his
mother had prepared dinner for us. In the courtyard of his home,
a large tablecloth had been laid on the floor and cushions were
placed around it. We took our seats and Mohammed came out from
the kitchen with an enormous bowl of mansaf, a traditional Bedouin
dish of rice and chicken. Following Mohammed's lead, we went to
work in the traditional way, crowding up around the bowl and grabbing
fingers-full of rice. Every so often, Mohammed would grab a particularly
appetizing piece of chicken and hand it to one of us.
When our stomachs were sufficiently stuffed, Mohammed went to
make some tea. Walking back with the kettle, he tripped and the
pot went flying across the courtyard to where we were sitting.
Everyone jumped while
Mohammed broke into hysterics. The pot was empty.
I wondered if he had learned that one from watching the Harlem
Globetrotters on his satellite TV, which had been flickering next
to us the whole time. Over tea, we made some small conversation
but Mohammed's attention was tuned to the tableau of car crashes
and freak accidents on "Shocking Videos." He reclined
back on his elbows, transfixed like a child watching Saturday
morning cartoons. At one point, a picture of the World Trade Center
came up. I knew what was coming next. I looked over at Mohammed
while the towers were collapsing. He turned to me grinning and
then gave me a thumbs-up. A moment later, Osama bin Laden was
up on the screen. Mohammed dutifully gave a four-fingered salute.
We were spending a lot of time with Mohammed, but when it came
to the subject of fighting in Iraq he was proving to be wilier
than we had anticipated. He entertained our questions with only
vague responses. At dinner that night I asked why he decided to
go to Iraq. He answered: "If you think you can do something
for humanity, you do it." And he turned back toward the television.
We decided to try our luck with some other fighters.
The perfect opportunity presented itself one morning at the market
while we were again visiting Mohammed.
Zaher's friend Abed was having tea in Mohammed's shop when we
arrived. We had already met Abed a couple of nights before at
the Koranic school. He arrived that night in his work clothes,
after we had already made the introductions. At one point while
the group was singing, I looked over and noticed he was crying.
So it came as a surprise when Zaher later introduced him as his
friend that was always clowning around. But true to Zaher's depiction,
Abed soon began cracking jokes and laughing heartily.
As soon as we arrived, Zaher's 3-year-old nephew, who had came
along with us, ran up to Abed and began using him like a jungle
gym. The rest of us sat under the shade of the tarpaulin that
is Mohammed's shop. Like the flies around our teacups, a crowd
of men buzzed around the shop, curious about Mohammed's guests.
At one point, an older man came into the shop and asked where
we were from. Learning that we were from the West, he asked what
we thought about George Bush and Tony Blair. Before the question
was fully translated, he gave us his own thoughts. "Bush,"
he said making sign language for I slit his throat. He did the
same for Blair and, having made his point, he walked away.
Zaher's nephew, who up until this point I thought was mute, was
apparently paying attention and shouted something in Arabic. All
I caught was something "Bush," something "Blair."
I asked Zaher what his nephew had just said. "Oh, he says
something like, 'Down with Bush, down with Blair,' " Zaher
said matter- of-factly. "That's just something they teach
the kids in school."
Mohammed was growing frustrated with the interloping and decided
to close down the shop. We had planned to drive out to some nearby
ruins and Abed asked if he could join us. Given the remoteness
of the place, we decided that this would be the time to ask Abed
for an interview.
"Mujahedeen" is a weighted word in the West. For me
- and I don't think I'm alone - it conjures up images of battle-hardened
warriors bent on waging jihad. As we tromped around the site with
Abed goofily serenading Mariana with "I Want to Spend My
Lifetime Loving You" from the movie "The Mask of Zorro,"
he just wasn't living up to this image. Compared to the mujahedeen
of my mind, this young man with the Chiclets-grin and geeky sense
of humor was sorely disappointing. But in many ways, I suppose
it is more disturbing to think that on the other side of the divide
stands, not a crazed fanatic, but your good friend from high school
who was always the class clown.
"We haven't gone to our enemies, they came to us,"
Abed began. "I don't want to happen in Iraq what has happened
to Palestine or South Lebanon. I love to do something for Islam.
Be proud of it in front of God, in front of people, in front of
my relatives, even if I am a martyr. On the contrary, I don't
lose much; I gain a lot if I am a martyr. Our aim is peace, war
for peace. We don't fight, but we defend for the sake of peace...
And if we are martyrs, there is a great prize: heaven, which we've
been promised."
In Iraq, he was welcomed with open arms. "They offered us
more than they could afford," he said. "Islamic jihad
is a great, great, great thing. It's the highest position in Islam
that a real Muslim is searching for. I was surprised and content
at the same time. I met Muslims from all over Arab countries...
Nearly, no for sure, from all Arab countries and there were many,
many, many, many, many. My feeling was that I was content to meet
all those brothers that I hoped I would meet someday and the time
I wished to meet them came. I felt that the world is still healthy
and still the Muslim man is looking for peace. He didn't come
to kill or for his own interest. There was something that pushed
him."
When he arrived in Baghdad, there were more people willing to
fight than there were arms. Abed was in charge of a group of 125
fighters, for which he said he received just 20 weapons. Having
first choice, Abed chose a Kalashnikov and distributed the rest
among the most experienced men. Abed had served the compulsory
2 1/2 years in the Syrian army, but many of the men had little
or no military experience. They had a difficult time finding anyone
who could operate an RPG - rocket propelled grenade - their largest
weapon, he said.
Those without weapons would sit in the mosque, pray and wait
for news. And those with weapons found themselves severely outmatched
by the Americans. After Baghdad they went to Al Qadissiya and
then to Karbala. But the Americans were moving quickly and they
had to retreat. Mostly they engaged them in street fighting, using
guerrilla tactics. Unarmed and dressed in civilian clothes, they
would do their reconnaissance, walking up to the U.S. troops and
assessing their armaments, before deciding how to attack. "We
saw Americans face to face," he said. "I don't know
if I killed anyone; I shot many times."
Before they knew it, they heard the Americans had reached Baghdad.
In the south there was nothing left to do, so they headed back
north. "When we entered Baghdad it was a big disaster,"
Abed said. "Unfortunately the enemy arrived in the heart
of Baghdad."
We told Abed about the images we had seen on TV of Iraqis celebrating
when the Americans came. We asked him about the Americans being
welcomed by the Iraqis.
"It's a funny question," he said. "There was no
welcoming. I am a human and somebody kills my son or my brother
and I welcome him? It's impossible. I saw with my own eyes that
houses were bombed, families were hit, orchards were burned under
the pretext that there were people hiding in them. It was random
shooting. Is it logical that somebody enters my house, kills my
sons and I welcome him?"
Abed had snuck into Iraq, but when he returned to Syria, about
a month later, he walked through the official border crossing.
Without any papers, and having entered Iraq illegally in the first
place, the authorities at the Syrian border questioned him. They
couldn't lie, Abed said. There were too many of them returning,
so they told them everything.
Abed described the authorities as sympathetic. "It depends
on two things," he said. "The legal and the moral issue.
As moral, for sure they all felt that we were mujahedeen for the
sake of Islam against war. But legally, the law states that they
should investigate us and they should follow with the basic methods
that any country follows. But they cannot imprison us because
we were not a small group. If they want to imprison, they have
to imprison thousands."
Abed wasn't aware of anyone who had been detained. From his small
town alone, he said there were 300 men who went to fight. When
they returned to their village, they were given a hero's welcome
with huge wedding-style celebrations.
We told Abed what Zaher had told us about the way he was perceived
before and after going to fight. Abed smiled a bit and said: "I
don't like this because I don't want to show off or be snobby.
What makes me happy from this experience is that the world is
still good. There are still nice people, there are still people
who wish to defend people, to help people... Definitely, it changed
many things. People look upon mujahedeen as someone who inspires
others... A human who sacrifices himself for the sake of rights,
this for sure is not an ordinary person."
When asked how he felt now that the war was over, Abed replied
that it was not.
"Bush is looking for reasons, any reasons to enter Syria
or any other Islamic state. We all know this is a war against
Islam. It started with Afghanistan, [is] now in Iraq and it will
continue. This is something that everyone knows."
If he didn't think the war was over, we asked, why did he return?
"The decision of my return is not final," Abed said.
"This does not mean I am back for good... My return [to Iraq]
is a matter that must happen, I and many other mujahedeen."
After interviewing Abed, Mike asked if I felt I had a deeper personal
connection to the story since the people we were spending time
with had tried and perhaps succeeded in killing some of my fellow
countrymen. At several points during the course of those days,
I found myself trying to picture Mohammed or Abed staring down
a Kalashnikov, taking potshots at American soldiers. I was having
a difficult time reconciling the incredible friendliness and hospitality
they extended toward us with the preconceived idea I had of what
a mujahedeen was. Certainly I found it disturbing that Mohammed
had given me the thumbs-up while we watched the World Trade Center
collapse. But I almost expected that. Everyone who I spoke to
about the event told me without a hint of irony that it was an
American/Israeli conspiracy and couldn't possibly have been Osama
bin Laden.
The gesture and the salute that followed fit perfectly into the
character I already had sketched in my mind. What didn't fit was
that the mujahedeen I met with weren't battle-hardened warriors,
they were merchants selling secondhand items from tattered tents,
or they sold chickens. They did maintenance and repair work. They
were family men who were gentle with children, kind to strangers
and joking with friends. In the pecking order of mujahedeen, they
were little more than opportunists who saw their shot and took
it. The problem is that their shot isn't any less lethal and if
this small town in eastern Syria is any indication, there are
many more just like them.
Darren Foster is a freelance journalist based in London.
Women in Iraq and the United States have a lot in common. Both
list safety as a top concern, and both are worried about
the increasing violence and militarization of their societies.
Both see jobs and health care as top priorities, and both feel
uncertain about their economic security. Both are